Share
 
Title
Code
Session Type
Format
CME accreditation
ROOM/CHANNEL
Date Time
Moderator

The 2020 fast-track targets were powerful motivators, but they were largely missed. Not all of them were prioritized in national responses. This led to prevention and rights targets being neglected in many countries, in addition to inequality across population groups in progress towards meeting treatment targets. Evidence and experience were synthesized in a comprehensive evidence review undertaken by UNAIDS in 2020, demonstrating that inequalities are a key reason why the 2020 global targets were missed.

10:30
2 min
Introduction
John NKENGASONG, U.S. Department of State, United States
Richard BURZYNSKI, Independent consultant, Canada
10:32
8 min
Are the 2025 targets entirely different from the 2020 targets? If so, how? Do they offer better possibilities than the 2020 targets for better addressing of inequalities in service access
Paul DE LAY, UNAIDS, United States
Slides
10:40
8 min
How can governments most effectively use the 2025 targets for better health outcomes? Can they help prioritize areas where it matters most?
Aleny COUTO, Ministry of Health, Mozambique
Slides
10:48
8 min
Are the 2025 targets a better tool for addressing HIV among key populations than the fast-track targets? How can communities best leverage the targets to ensure that the response focuses on where we can make the biggest difference?
Judy CHANG, INPUD, Italy
Slides
10:56
34 min
Q&A
Paul DE LAY, UNAIDS, United States
Judy CHANG, INPUD, Italy
Aleny COUTO, Ministry of Health, Mozambique
Richard BURZYNSKI, Independent consultant, Canada
AUTHOR
SUMMARY
HIGHLIGHTS
CRITICAL ASSESSMENT